Why governments' attempts to pick winners produce more losers than winners.





Navigation


Individualist Blogs


Interventionist Blogs


Miscellaneous Blogs


Think-tanks


Syndicate


House of Lords

A party-politicised House of Lords

While we are stuck with big government, an important check on the power of the executive is an independent second chamber. Although the undemocratic nature of the House of Lords is much derided, it is noticeable that their Lordships have provided much more substantial and well-reasoned opposition to the worst excesses of the current government than has been provided by the Commons. This is quite significantly related to the fact that many of their Lordships do not owe their positions to conformity with party policy.

Jack Straw's leaked proposal for reform of the Lords would undermine that independence. He proposes that half the peers should be appointed and half should be elected, as though this is a compromise. Indeed, much of the debate seems to consider that there are only two options: appointment or election, and that the only question is what balance there should be between the two. This, indeed, is the quality of the opposition parties' contribution to the debate.


Syndicate

Quotes

"In spite of its alluring name, the welfare state stands or falls by compulsion. It is compulsion imposed upon us with the state's power to punish noncompliance. Once this is clear, it is equally clear that the welfare state is an evil the same as each and every restriction of freedom."

— Wilhelm Roepke



Losers of the month


Archives